Hiace Van STD DSL MT vs DFSK C35 Standard Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
AED 128312
TBD
AED 123456
TBD
AED 1727
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
AED 18.76
Daily Fule Payment
AED 10.17
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 131.32
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 71.19
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 562.8
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 305.1
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 6847.4
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 3712.05
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
140
/
1499
Dimensions
3
2
2210
/
16
14"
5265
4500
1950
1680
1990
1985
3210
3050
3300
/
5.5m
/
2530 - 1760 - 1340
/
6.2m³
/
1090
800
Fuel Economy
13.0 Km/L
15.5
70
55L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
5MT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Drive
Macpherson Strut
Macpherson independent suspension
Leaf spring rigid
MacPherson 5 Leaf Springs Non-Independent Suspension
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
Drum
215/70R16C
185/80R14
215/70R16C
185/80R14
/
Disc
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.8
1.5
Diesel
Gasoline
174
114
420
148
/
Naturally Aspirated
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
