Kona Electric 2025 vs Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and stylish design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Advanced technical features
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Poor off road performance
- Light noise inside the cabin at high speeds
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Price Comparison
TBD
AED 265020
TBD
AED 255000
TBD
AED 3567
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
AED 16.47
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 115.29
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 510.57
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 6011.55
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
167
240 km/h
/
6
/
3500 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
8 Seater
4205
5334 mm
1800
2006 mm
1555
1930 mm
/
5 Doors
/
3111 mm
/
530 L
/
250 m
Fuel Economy
/
11 Km/L
/
88 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
204
380 BHP
395
637 Nm
/
V
/
3.5 L
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
