DFSK C35 Standard vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
AED 10.98
Daily Fule Payment
AED 18.3
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 76.86
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 128.1
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 340.38
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 567.3
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 4007.7
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 6679.5
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Van
/
Engine / Motor
140
160
1499
/
/
4
Dimensions
2
3 Seater
14"
/
4500
4695
1680
1695
1985
1980
3050
2570
800
/
Fuel Economy
15.5
9.9
55L
70
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
Transmission
5MT
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Macpherson independent suspension
/
MacPherson 5 Leaf Springs Non-Independent Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Drum
/
185/80R14
/
185/80R14
/
Engine
1.5
2.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
114
158 BHP
148
243
Technologies
✓
✓
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
