ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 vs Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
AED 73108
AED 77860
AED 70339
AED 74900
AED 984
AED 1048
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
AED 10.98
Daily Fule Payment
AED 10.98
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 76.86
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 76.86
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 340.38
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 340.38
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 4007.7
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 4007.7
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
190
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
18
/
5
/
4430
4.275
1818
1.765
1635
1.535
2610
2.570
359/1166
240
145
/
Fuel Economy
15.9
15.4
45
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
168
148 BHP
88
/
180
192
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Motor
/
N/A
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
