CarteaCompare CarsBAW MNI BUS vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter M/T

BAW MNI BUS vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter M/T Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Price Comparison

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0 L/KM

0.09 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

/

Daily Fule Payment

AED 12.83

Weekly Fule Payment

/

Weekly Fule Payment

AED 89.78

Monthly Fule Payment

/

Monthly Fule Payment

AED 397.58

Yearly Fule Payment

/

Yearly Fule Payment

AED 4681.13

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Engine / Motor

/

4

Dimensions

/

8 Seater

/

4715

/

1800

/

1985

/

2985

Fuel Economy

/

11.4

/

75

Interior

/

/

Safety

/

Transmission

/

Manual

Chassis & Steering

/

Rear Wheel Drive

Exterior

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

2.5 L

/

Diesel

/

88 BHP

/

192

Technologies

/

Popular Car Comparisons

BAW | BAW MNI BUS

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter A/T

BAW | BAW MNI BUS

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter M/T

BAW | BAW MNI BUS

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)

BAW | BAW MNI BUS

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van

BAW | BAW MNI BUS

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van High Roof LWB

BAW Related Car

Toyota Related Car

Toyota Related New Car

Toyota Related Used Car