CarteaCompare CarsBAW MNI BUS vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van

BAW MNI BUS vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Price Comparison

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0 L/KM

0.1 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

/

Daily Fule Payment

AED 13.5

Weekly Fule Payment

/

Weekly Fule Payment

AED 94.5

Monthly Fule Payment

/

Monthly Fule Payment

AED 418.5

Yearly Fule Payment

/

Yearly Fule Payment

AED 4927.5

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Engine / Motor

/

160

/

4

Dimensions

/

3 Seater

/

4695

/

1695

/

1980

/

2570

Fuel Economy

/

9.9

/

70

Interior

/

/

Safety

/

Transmission

/

Manual

Chassis & Steering

/

Rear Wheel Drive

Exterior

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

2.7 L

/

Gasoline

/

158 BHP

/

243

Technologies

/

Popular Car Comparisons

BAW | BAW MNI BUS

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter A/T

BAW | BAW MNI BUS

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter M/T

BAW | BAW MNI BUS

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)

BAW | BAW MNI BUS

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van

BAW | BAW MNI BUS

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van High Roof LWB

BAW Related Car

Toyota Related Car

Toyota Related New Car

Toyota Related Used Car