300 Challenger 2.0T vs Kona 2.0L Comfort Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Positive
- Modern and stylish design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Advanced technical features
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Poor off road performance
- Light noise inside the cabin at high speeds
Price Comparison
AED 140340
AED 73840
AED 135000
AED 71000
AED 1889
AED 994
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
AED 13.85
Daily Fule Payment
AED 11.08
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 96.95
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 77.56
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 429.35
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 343.48
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 5055.25
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 4044.2
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
194 km/h
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
4165 mm
1930 mm
1801 mm
1927 mm
1565 mm
2750 mm
2600 mm
400 L
544 L
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
13.3 Km/L
75 L
50 L
10 Km/L
13.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
150 BHP
387 Nm
180 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
