CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
AED 125780
AED 140340
AED 121000
AED 135000
AED 1693
AED 1889
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
AED 10.8
Daily Fule Payment
AED 13.5
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 75.6
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 94.5
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 334.8
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 418.5
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 3942
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 4927.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5075 mm
4760 mm
1969 mm
1930 mm
1716 mm
1927 mm
2930 mm
2750 mm
407 L
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
11.8 Km/L
10 Km/L
74 L
75 L
11.8 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
230 BHP
224 BHP
420 Nm
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
