Kicks SL vs Atto 3 Premium Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
AED 114260
AED 98660
AED 109900
AED 94900
AED 1538
AED 1328
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
160 km/h
4
/
1997 cc
/
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
5 Doors
4365 mm
4455 mm
1800 mm
2050 mm
1620 mm
1615 mm
2655 mm
2720 mm
470 L
440 L
186 mm
205 mm
/
215/55R18
Fuel Economy
45 L
/
15 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
5
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
LCD
/
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Automatic Anti-Glare
/
RCW
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Battery/Charging
/
AC (7KW) DC (80KW)
Transmission
CVT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
/
Petrol
Electric
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
None
/
4
/
142 BHP
201 BHP
190 Nm
310 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
9
/
BYD Blade Battery (LFP)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
