Mercedes‑AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC+ 4‑Door vs 12Cilindri Spider Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful engine performance and excellent driving interaction
- Sporty and luxurious exterior design draws attention
- High-end interior quality and advanced driving technologies
Negative
- High price and large maintenance costs
- Limited driving comfort on normal roads
- Limited space for passengers and luggage
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.12 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
AED 16.2
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 113.4
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 502.2
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 5913
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
3.2
/
Engine / Motor
315
340 km/h
Dimensions
4
2
5,024
4,693
1,953
1,971
1,455
1,276
2,951
2,720
Fuel Economy
8.5
/
66
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Transmission
9-speed automatic
7-speed F1 dual-clutch gearbox
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Drive
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
V
V
4.0L
6.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
Twin-turbo
/
639hp
790hp
470
/
900
718 Nm
/
6.5 L naturally aspirated V12 (65°) — dry-sump
/
718 Nm @ 7,000 rpm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/

-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)



-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)



