CS95 ROYAL vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
AED 135140
AED 140340
AED 130000
AED 135000
AED 1819
AED 1889
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
AED 16.95
Daily Fule Payment
AED 16.95
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 118.65
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 118.65
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 508.5
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 508.5
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 6186.75
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 6186.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
4949
4760 mm
1930
1930 mm
1790
1927 mm
2810
2750 mm
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
10.5
10 Km/L
74
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3"
/
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
10+Amplifier
9
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
245 / 55 R19
/
245 / 55 R19
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 T
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
233
224 BHP
390
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Snow, Eco
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
