CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
AED 125780
AED 249340
AED 121000
AED 239900
AED 1693
AED 3356
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
AED 13.56
Daily Fule Payment
AED 18.65
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 94.92
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 130.52
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 420.36
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 578
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 4949.4
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 6805.43
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5075 mm
5115 mm
1969 mm
1980 mm
1716 mm
1920 mm
2930 mm
2890 mm
407 L
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
11.8 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
74 L
110 L
11.8 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
230 BHP
271 BHP
420 Nm
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
