H9 Mid vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road capabilities
- Spacious and comfortable interior space
- Powerful engine performance in various conditions
Negative
- Average fuel economy
- Interior design needs to be improved
- Noise control is lower than expected
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
AED 124660
AED 140340
AED 119900
AED 135000
AED 1678
AED 1889
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
AED 16.95
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 118.65
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 508.5
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 6186.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
4950 mm
4760 mm
1930 mm
1930 mm
1960 mm
1927 mm
2800 mm
2750 mm
750 L
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
90 L
75 L
9.1 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
6
/
Front and Rear
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.6
12.3
8
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/60 R18
/
265/60 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
214
224 BHP
380 Nm
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
