Tucson 2.0L Smart (AWD) vs Atto 3 Comfort Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
AED 111140
AED 98660
AED 106900
AED 94900
AED 1496
AED 1328
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
AED 11.83
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
AED 82.85
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
AED 355.05
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
AED 4319.78
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
160 km/h
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4630 mm
4455
1865 mm
1875
1665 mm
1615
2755 mm
2720
539 L
310
/
215/60R17
/
5 Doors
/
205 mm
Fuel Economy
11.5 Km/L
/
54 L
/
11.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
5
/
Front Row Seats
/
LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Battery/Charging
/
AC (7KW) DC (80KW)
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
Macpherson
/
Multi-Link
Wheels/brakes
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
156 BHP
201 BHP
192 Nm
310 Nm
Motor
/
9
/
BYD Blade Battery (LFP)
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
