CarteaCompare CarsMU X 3.0T Standard (4x2) vs Jeep Wrangler 2013 Rubicon 3.6L Manual

MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2) vs Jeep Wrangler 2013 Rubicon 3.6L Manual Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Superior off-road capability
  • Classic and attractive design
  • Wide customization capability

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • Driving comfort is less on ordinary roads
  • The high price of fully equipped models

Price Comparison

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0 L/KM

0.13 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

/

Daily Fule Payment

AED 18.01

Weekly Fule Payment

/

Weekly Fule Payment

AED 126.04

Monthly Fule Payment

/

Monthly Fule Payment

AED 558.16

Yearly Fule Payment

/

Yearly Fule Payment

AED 6571.83

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

157

/

6

Dimensions

7 Seater

5 Seater

4850 mm

3881

1870 mm

1872

1875 mm

1800

2855 mm

2424

235 L

430

Fuel Economy

80 L

67

/

8.0

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Manual

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.0 L

3.6 L

Diesel

Gasoline

190 BHP

280 BHP

450 Nm

352

Technologies

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2)

VS

Jeep | Jeep Wrangler 2014 Rubicon 3.6L Manual

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2)

VS

Jeep | Jeep Wrangler 2014 Sahara 3.6L Manual Plus

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2)

VS

Nissan | Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.5 SL 4WD (7-Seater)

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2)

VS

Nissan | Nissan X-Trail 2015 2.5 SL 4WD

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2)

VS

Jeep | Jeep Wrangler 2013 Rubicon 3.6L Manual

Isuzu Related Car

Jeep Related Car

Jeep Related New Car

Jeep Related Used Car